@Test
public void testAnnotatedFieldInjectionComponentCanDependOnConfig() {
CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer apc =
new CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer(new String[] {"a=a", "b=2", "c=true"});
DefaultPicoContainer pico = new DefaultPicoContainer(new AnnotatedFieldInjection(), apc);
pico.addConfig("zzz", "zzz");
pico.as(Characteristics.USE_NAMES).addComponent(NeedsAFew3.class);
NeedsAFew3 needsAFew = pico.getComponent(NeedsAFew3.class);
assertNotNull(needsAFew);
assertEquals("a", needsAFew.a);
assertEquals(2, needsAFew.b);
assertEquals(true, needsAFew.c);
}
@Test
public void testUnsatisfiableIfNoSuitableTyesForInjection() {
CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer apc =
new CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer(new String[] {"zz=zz"});
DefaultPicoContainer pico = new DefaultPicoContainer(apc);
pico.as(Characteristics.USE_NAMES).addComponent(NeedsAFew.class);
try {
Object foo = pico.getComponent(NeedsAFew.class);
fail();
} catch (AbstractInjector.UnsatisfiableDependenciesException e) {
// expetced;
}
}
@Test
public void testComponentWithCtorAndNamedFieldWorkToegether() throws NoSuchMethodException {
DefaultPicoContainer dpc =
new DefaultPicoContainer(
new CompositeInjection(new ConstructorInjection(), new NamedFieldInjection()),
new NullLifecycleStrategy(),
new EmptyPicoContainer());
dpc.addComponent(Bar.class);
dpc.addConfig("one", "1");
dpc.addConfig("two", "2");
dpc.as(injectionFieldNames("one", "two")).addComponent(Foo4.class);
Foo4 foo4 = dpc.getComponent(Foo4.class);
assertNotNull(foo4);
assertNotNull(foo4.bar);
assertNotNull(foo4.one);
assertEquals("1", foo4.one);
assertNotNull(foo4.two);
assertEquals("2", foo4.two);
}