@Test
 public void testAnnotatedFieldInjectionComponentCanDependOnConfig() {
   CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer apc =
       new CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer(new String[] {"a=a", "b=2", "c=true"});
   DefaultPicoContainer pico = new DefaultPicoContainer(new AnnotatedFieldInjection(), apc);
   pico.addConfig("zzz", "zzz");
   pico.as(Characteristics.USE_NAMES).addComponent(NeedsAFew3.class);
   NeedsAFew3 needsAFew = pico.getComponent(NeedsAFew3.class);
   assertNotNull(needsAFew);
   assertEquals("a", needsAFew.a);
   assertEquals(2, needsAFew.b);
   assertEquals(true, needsAFew.c);
 }
 @Test
 public void testUnsatisfiableIfNoSuitableTyesForInjection() {
   CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer apc =
       new CommandLineArgumentsPicoContainer(new String[] {"zz=zz"});
   DefaultPicoContainer pico = new DefaultPicoContainer(apc);
   pico.as(Characteristics.USE_NAMES).addComponent(NeedsAFew.class);
   try {
     Object foo = pico.getComponent(NeedsAFew.class);
     fail();
   } catch (AbstractInjector.UnsatisfiableDependenciesException e) {
     // expetced;
   }
 }
 @Test
 public void testComponentWithCtorAndNamedFieldWorkToegether() throws NoSuchMethodException {
   DefaultPicoContainer dpc =
       new DefaultPicoContainer(
           new CompositeInjection(new ConstructorInjection(), new NamedFieldInjection()),
           new NullLifecycleStrategy(),
           new EmptyPicoContainer());
   dpc.addComponent(Bar.class);
   dpc.addConfig("one", "1");
   dpc.addConfig("two", "2");
   dpc.as(injectionFieldNames("one", "two")).addComponent(Foo4.class);
   Foo4 foo4 = dpc.getComponent(Foo4.class);
   assertNotNull(foo4);
   assertNotNull(foo4.bar);
   assertNotNull(foo4.one);
   assertEquals("1", foo4.one);
   assertNotNull(foo4.two);
   assertEquals("2", foo4.two);
 }