// It's important that this be the _only_ thread removing things from pendingDynamicCloses!
// This is single-threaded, but I tried a multi-threaded approach and didn't see any performance
// gains, so
// there's no good justification for the complexity. I suspect that the locking on things like
// DefaultSolrCoreState
// essentially create a single-threaded process anyway.
@Override
public void run() {
while (!container.isShutDown()) {
synchronized (solrCores.getModifyLock()) { // need this so we can wait and be awoken.
try {
solrCores.getModifyLock().wait();
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
// Well, if we've been told to stop, we will. Otherwise, continue on and check to see if
// there are
// any cores to close.
}
}
for (SolrCore removeMe = solrCores.getCoreToClose();
removeMe != null && !container.isShutDown();
removeMe = solrCores.getCoreToClose()) {
try {
removeMe.close();
} finally {
solrCores.removeFromPendingOps(removeMe.getName());
}
}
}
}
public static boolean injectNonGracefullClose(CoreContainer cc) {
if (cc.isShutDown() && nonGracefullClose != null) {
Random rand = random();
if (null == rand) return true;
Pair<Boolean, Integer> pair = parseValue(nonGracefullClose);
boolean enabled = pair.first();
int chanceIn100 = pair.second();
if (enabled && rand.nextInt(100) >= (100 - chanceIn100)) {
if (rand.nextBoolean()) {
throw new TestShutdownFailError("Test exception for non graceful close");
} else {
final Thread cthread = Thread.currentThread();
TimerTask task =
new TimerTask() {
@Override
public void run() {
// as long as places that catch interruptedexception reset that
// interrupted status,
// we should only need to do it once
try {
// call random() again to get the correct one for this thread
Random taskRand = random();
Thread.sleep(taskRand.nextInt(1000));
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
cthread.interrupt();
timers.remove(this);
cancel();
}
};
Timer timer = new Timer();
timers.add(timer);
timer.schedule(task, rand.nextInt(500));
}
}
}
return true;
}
