@Test
public void testEmptyContext() {
ConsistentHashPartitionFilter filter = new ConsistentHashPartitionFilter();
List<ServiceEndPoint> endPoints = ImmutableList.of(FOO, BAR);
assertEquals(endPoints, filter.filter(endPoints, PartitionContextBuilder.empty()));
}
@Test
public void testConsistency() {
ConsistentHashPartitionFilter filter = new ConsistentHashPartitionFilter();
List<ServiceEndPoint> endPoints = ImmutableList.of(FOO, BAR);
// Generate a context to reuse and ensure consistency. What's in the context doesn't matter.
PartitionContext context = PartitionContextBuilder.of(UUID.randomUUID().toString());
assertEquals(filter.filter(endPoints, context), filter.filter(endPoints, context));
}
@Test
public void testIrrelevantPartitionContext() {
ConsistentHashPartitionFilter filter =
new ConsistentHashPartitionFilter("cluster", "ensemble", "group");
List<ServiceEndPoint> endPoints = ImmutableList.of(FOO, BAR);
// Ignores the PartitionContext because it doesn't have an entry for cluster, ensemble or group.
assertEquals(
endPoints, filter.filter(endPoints, PartitionContextBuilder.of("partition", "aaa")));
}
@Test
public void testHashToBar() {
ConsistentHashPartitionFilter filter = new ConsistentHashPartitionFilter();
List<ServiceEndPoint> endPoints = ImmutableList.of(FOO, BAR);
// It just so happens that "c" hashes to the same place as "bar". As long as the
// ConsistentHashEndPointFilter
// implementation doesn't change in a backward-compatible way, this should be deterministic and
// testable.
assertEquals(singleton(BAR), filter.filter(endPoints, PartitionContextBuilder.of("c")));
}
@Test
public void testRelevantPartitionContext() {
ConsistentHashPartitionFilter filter =
new ConsistentHashPartitionFilter("cluster", "ensemble", "group");
List<ServiceEndPoint> endPoints = ImmutableList.of(FOO, BAR);
// Doesn't ignore the PartitionContext because it has an entry for at least one of cluster,
// ensemble or group.
assertEquals(
singleton(FOO), filter.filter(endPoints, PartitionContextBuilder.of("ensemble", "aaa")));
}
@Test
public void testServiceIdConflict() {
ConsistentHashPartitionFilter filter = new ConsistentHashPartitionFilter();
// Setup the ring with FOO and BAR.
assertEquals(
singleton(FOO), filter.filter(ImmutableList.of(FOO, BAR), PartitionContextBuilder.of("a")));
// Add a new server that will get ignored because it has the same ID as FOO and FOO comes last
// in the list.
assertEquals(
singleton(FOO),
filter.filter(ImmutableList.of(FOO2, FOO, BAR), PartitionContextBuilder.of("a")));
// Now remove the original FOO and verify that FOO2 is discovered. This can go wrong if we're
// not careful in
// the ring update implementation because removing FOO doesn't change the set of end point IDs.
assertEquals(
singleton(FOO2),
filter.filter(ImmutableList.of(FOO2, BAR), PartitionContextBuilder.of("a")));
}
@Override
public PartitionContext forCall(Method method, Object... args) {
return PartitionContextBuilder.empty();
}
