@Override
public void setEntity(EntityLocal entity) {
super.setEntity(entity);
if (isRunning()) {
doStartPolling();
}
}
@SuppressWarnings({"unchecked", "rawtypes"})
public <T extends Policy> T createPolicy(PolicySpec<T> spec) {
if (spec.getFlags().containsKey("parent")) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"Spec's flags must not contain parent; use spec.parent() instead for " + spec);
}
try {
Class<? extends T> clazz = spec.getType();
T pol;
if (isNewStylePolicy(clazz)) {
pol = constructPolicy(clazz);
} else {
pol = constructOldStyle(clazz, MutableMap.copyOf(spec.getFlags()));
}
if (spec.getDisplayName() != null) ((AbstractPolicy) pol).setName(spec.getDisplayName());
if (isNewStylePolicy(clazz)) {
((AbstractPolicy) pol).setManagementContext(managementContext);
Map<String, Object> config =
ConfigBag.newInstance().putAll(spec.getFlags()).putAll(spec.getConfig()).getAllConfig();
((AbstractPolicy) pol)
.configure(MutableMap.copyOf(config)); // TODO AbstractPolicy.configure modifies the map
}
// TODO Can we avoid this for "new-style policies"? Should we just trust the configure()
// method,
// which the user may have overridden?
// Also see InternalLocationFactory for same issue, which this code is based on.
for (Map.Entry<ConfigKey<?>, Object> entry : spec.getConfig().entrySet()) {
((AbstractPolicy) pol).setConfig((ConfigKey) entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
}
((AbstractPolicy) pol).init();
return pol;
} catch (Exception e) {
throw Exceptions.propagate(e);
}
}
@Override
public void resume() {
currentFailureStartTime = null;
currentRecoveryStartTime = null;
lastPublished = LastPublished.NONE;
executorQueued.set(false);
executorTime = 0;
super.resume();
doStartPolling();
}
@Override
public void suspend() {
scheduledTask.cancel(true);
super.suspend();
}
