/**
* Send a simple invite request from the RI and check whether it is properly delivered by the TI
* SipProvider
*/
public void testReceiveRequest() {
try {
// create an empty invite request.
Request invite = createRiInviteRequest(null, null, null);
RequestEvent receivedRequestEvent = null;
try {
// Send using RI and collect using TI
eventCollector.collectRequestEvent(tiSipProvider);
riSipProvider.sendRequest(invite);
waitForMessage();
receivedRequestEvent = eventCollector.extractCollectedRequestEvent();
assertNotNull("The sent request was not received at the other end!", receivedRequestEvent);
assertNotNull(
"The sent request was not received at the other end!",
receivedRequestEvent.getRequest());
} catch (TooManyListenersException ex) {
// This time adding the listener is (sort of) part of the test
// so we fail instead of just "throwing on" the exc
ex.printStackTrace();
fail(
"A TooManyListenersException was thrown while trying to add "
+ "a SipListener to a TI SipProvider.");
} catch (SipException ex) {
throw new TckInternalError("The RI failed to send the request!", ex);
}
// question: should we compare sent and received request?
// my opinion: finding a discrepancy while comparing requests
// would most probably mean a parse error and parsing is not what
// we are currently testing
// Transaction initiating requests should not have a server transaction
// associated with them as the application might decide to handle the
// request statelessly
assertNull(
"The Tested Implementation has implicitly created a ServerTransaction "
+ "for the received request. Transactions should only be created "
+ "explicitly using the SipProvider.getNewXxxTransaction() method.",
receivedRequestEvent.getServerTransaction());
} catch (Throwable exc) {
exc.printStackTrace();
fail(exc.getClass().getName() + ": " + exc.getMessage());
}
assertTrue(new Exception().getStackTrace()[0].toString(), true);
}
