public void unparse(SqlWriter writer, SqlCall call, int leftPrec, int rightPrec) {
   final SqlWriter.Frame frame = writer.startFunCall(getName());
   call.operand(0).unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
   writer.sep("FROM");
   call.operand(1).unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
   writer.endFunCall(frame);
 }
Exemplo n.º 2
0
 public void unparse(SqlWriter writer, SqlNode[] operands, int leftPrec, int rightPrec) {
   final SqlWriter.Frame frame = writer.startFunCall(getName());
   operands[0].unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
   writer.sep("PLACING");
   operands[1].unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
   writer.sep("FROM");
   operands[2].unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
   if (4 == operands.length) {
     writer.sep("FOR");
     operands[3].unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
   }
   writer.endFunCall(frame);
 }
  public void unparse(SqlWriter writer, SqlNode[] operands, int leftPrec, int rightPrec) {
    final SqlWriter.Frame frame = writer.startList(BetweenFrameType, "", "");
    operands[VALUE_OPERAND].unparse(writer, getLeftPrec(), 0);
    writer.sep(getName());
    operands[SYMFLAG_OPERAND].unparse(writer, 0, 0);

    // If the expression for the lower bound contains a call to an AND
    // operator, we need to wrap the expression in parentheses to prevent
    // the AND from associating with BETWEEN. For example, we should
    // unparse
    //    a BETWEEN b OR (c AND d) OR e AND f
    // as
    //    a BETWEEN (b OR c AND d) OR e) AND f
    // If it were unparsed as
    //    a BETWEEN b OR c AND d OR e AND f
    // then it would be interpreted as
    //    (a BETWEEN (b OR c) AND d) OR (e AND f)
    // which would be wrong.
    int lowerPrec = new AndFinder().containsAnd(operands[LOWER_OPERAND]) ? 100 : 0;
    operands[LOWER_OPERAND].unparse(writer, lowerPrec, lowerPrec);
    writer.sep("AND");
    operands[UPPER_OPERAND].unparse(writer, 0, getRightPrec());
    writer.endList(frame);
  }