public void unparse(SqlWriter writer, SqlCall call, int leftPrec, int rightPrec) {
final SqlWriter.Frame frame = writer.startFunCall(getName());
call.operand(0).unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
writer.sep("FROM");
call.operand(1).unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
writer.endFunCall(frame);
}
public void unparse(SqlWriter writer, SqlNode[] operands, int leftPrec, int rightPrec) {
final SqlWriter.Frame frame = writer.startFunCall(getName());
operands[0].unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
writer.sep("PLACING");
operands[1].unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
writer.sep("FROM");
operands[2].unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
if (4 == operands.length) {
writer.sep("FOR");
operands[3].unparse(writer, leftPrec, rightPrec);
}
writer.endFunCall(frame);
}
public void unparse(SqlWriter writer, SqlNode[] operands, int leftPrec, int rightPrec) {
final SqlWriter.Frame frame = writer.startList(BetweenFrameType, "", "");
operands[VALUE_OPERAND].unparse(writer, getLeftPrec(), 0);
writer.sep(getName());
operands[SYMFLAG_OPERAND].unparse(writer, 0, 0);
// If the expression for the lower bound contains a call to an AND
// operator, we need to wrap the expression in parentheses to prevent
// the AND from associating with BETWEEN. For example, we should
// unparse
// a BETWEEN b OR (c AND d) OR e AND f
// as
// a BETWEEN (b OR c AND d) OR e) AND f
// If it were unparsed as
// a BETWEEN b OR c AND d OR e AND f
// then it would be interpreted as
// (a BETWEEN (b OR c) AND d) OR (e AND f)
// which would be wrong.
int lowerPrec = new AndFinder().containsAnd(operands[LOWER_OPERAND]) ? 100 : 0;
operands[LOWER_OPERAND].unparse(writer, lowerPrec, lowerPrec);
writer.sep("AND");
operands[UPPER_OPERAND].unparse(writer, 0, getRightPrec());
writer.endList(frame);
}