public static BoundingBoxInputImpl createBoundingBoxInput(String key, BoundingBox bounds) {
BoundingBoxInputDefinition bid = new BoundingBoxInputDefinition();
CodeType ct = new CodeType();
ct.setValue(key);
bid.setIdentifier(ct);
DefaultPoint min =
new DefaultPoint(null, null, null, new double[] {bounds.getMinLon(), bounds.getMinLat()});
DefaultPoint max =
new DefaultPoint(null, null, null, new double[] {bounds.getMaxLon(), bounds.getMaxLat()});
Envelope env = new DefaultEnvelope(min, max);
BoundingBoxInputImpl lii =
new BoundingBoxInputImpl(
bid, new LanguageString(key, null), new LanguageString(key, null), env);
return lii;
}
@Test
@Category(UnitTest.class)
public void testGetByBounds() throws Exception {
final BoundingBox queryBounds = ReviewTestUtils.createTestQueryBounds();
ReviewTestUtils.createPreparedData(resource());
ReviewTestUtils.markSomeItemsReviewed();
final ReviewableItemsStatistics response =
execGet(String.valueOf(mapId), null, queryBounds.toServicesString());
Assert.assertEquals(mapId, response.getMapId());
Assert.assertEquals(54, response.getNumTotalItems());
// TODO: fix - this should be returning 7 instead; I believe its ignoring way -44, whose review
// against item is a relation with a node inside the query bounds; oddly enough the review get
// resource test performs this query correctly, and they use nearly the same query code
Assert.assertEquals(6, response.getNumReviewableItems());
Assert.assertEquals(3, response.getNumReviewedItems());
}
