@Test
public void testUserSimpleDiffMultiAdd() throws Exception {
System.out.println("\n\n===[ testUserSimpleDiffMulti ]===\n");
// GIVEN
PrismObjectDefinition<UserType> userDef = getUserTypeDefinition();
PrismObject<UserType> user1 = userDef.instantiate();
user1.setOid(USER_JACK_OID);
PrismProperty<String> anamesProp1 = user1.findOrCreateProperty(UserType.F_ADDITIONAL_NAMES);
anamesProp1.addRealValue("foo");
anamesProp1.addRealValue("bar");
PrismObject<UserType> user2 = userDef.instantiate();
user2.setOid(USER_JACK_OID);
PrismProperty<String> anamesProp2 = user2.findOrCreateProperty(UserType.F_ADDITIONAL_NAMES);
anamesProp2.addRealValue("foo");
anamesProp2.addRealValue("bar");
anamesProp2.addRealValue("baz");
// WHEN
ObjectDelta<UserType> delta = user1.diff(user2);
// THEN
assertNotNull(delta);
System.out.println(delta.debugDump());
assertEquals("Unexpected number of midifications", 1, delta.getModifications().size());
PrismAsserts.assertPropertyAdd(delta, UserType.F_ADDITIONAL_NAMES, "baz");
assertEquals("Wrong OID", USER_JACK_OID, delta.getOid());
delta.checkConsistence();
}
private void fillInUserDrake(PrismObject<UserType> user, boolean assertDefinitions)
throws SchemaException {
user.setOid(USER_OID);
// fullName
PrismProperty<String> fullNameProperty = user.findOrCreateProperty(USER_FULLNAME_QNAME);
assertEquals(USER_FULLNAME_QNAME, fullNameProperty.getElementName());
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
if (assertDefinitions)
PrismAsserts.assertDefinition(fullNameProperty, DOMUtil.XSD_STRING, 1, 1);
fullNameProperty.setValue(new PrismPropertyValue<String>("Sir Fancis Drake"));
PrismProperty<String> fullNamePropertyAgain = user.findOrCreateProperty(USER_FULLNAME_QNAME);
// The "==" is there by purpose. We really want to make sure that is the same *instance*, that
// is was not created again
assertTrue("Property not the same", fullNameProperty == fullNamePropertyAgain);
// activation
PrismContainer<ActivationType> activationContainer =
user.findOrCreateContainer(USER_ACTIVATION_QNAME);
assertEquals(USER_ACTIVATION_QNAME, activationContainer.getElementName());
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
if (assertDefinitions)
PrismAsserts.assertDefinition(activationContainer, ACTIVATION_TYPE_QNAME, 0, 1);
PrismContainer<ActivationType> activationContainerAgain =
user.findOrCreateContainer(USER_ACTIVATION_QNAME);
// The "==" is there by purpose. We really want to make sure that is the same *instance*, that
// is was not created again
assertTrue("Property not the same", activationContainer == activationContainerAgain);
// activation/enabled
PrismProperty<Boolean> enabledProperty = user.findOrCreateProperty(USER_ENABLED_PATH);
assertEquals(USER_ENABLED_QNAME, enabledProperty.getElementName());
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
if (assertDefinitions)
PrismAsserts.assertDefinition(enabledProperty, DOMUtil.XSD_BOOLEAN, 0, 1);
enabledProperty.setValue(new PrismPropertyValue<Boolean>(true));
PrismProperty<Boolean> enabledPropertyAgain =
activationContainer.findOrCreateProperty(USER_ENABLED_QNAME);
// The "==" is there by purpose. We really want to make sure that is the same *instance*, that
// is was not created again
assertTrue("Property not the same", enabledProperty == enabledPropertyAgain);
// assignment
// Try to create this one from the value. It should work the same, but let's test a different
// code path
PrismContainer<AssignmentType> assignmentContainer =
user.getValue().findOrCreateContainer(USER_ASSIGNMENT_QNAME);
assertEquals(USER_ASSIGNMENT_QNAME, assignmentContainer.getElementName());
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
if (assertDefinitions)
PrismAsserts.assertDefinition(assignmentContainer, ASSIGNMENT_TYPE_QNAME, 0, -1);
PrismContainer<AssignmentType> assignmentContainerAgain =
user.findOrCreateContainer(USER_ASSIGNMENT_QNAME);
// The "==" is there by purpose. We really want to make sure that is the same *instance*, that
// is was not created again
assertTrue("Property not the same", assignmentContainer == assignmentContainerAgain);
assertEquals(
"Wrong number of assignment values (empty)", 0, assignmentContainer.getValues().size());
// assignment values: construct assignment value as a new container "out of the blue" and then
// add it.
PrismContainer<AssignmentType> assBlueContainer =
new PrismContainer<AssignmentType>(USER_ASSIGNMENT_QNAME);
PrismProperty<String> assBlueDescriptionProperty =
assBlueContainer.findOrCreateProperty(USER_DESCRIPTION_QNAME);
assBlueDescriptionProperty.addValue(
new PrismPropertyValue<String>("Assignment created out of the blue"));
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
assignmentContainer.mergeValues(assBlueContainer);
assertEquals(
"Wrong number of assignment values (after blue)",
1,
assignmentContainer.getValues().size());
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
// assignment values: construct assignment value as a new container value "out of the blue" and
// then add it.
PrismContainerValue<AssignmentType> assCyanContainerValue =
new PrismContainerValue<AssignmentType>();
PrismProperty<String> assCyanDescriptionProperty =
assCyanContainerValue.findOrCreateProperty(USER_DESCRIPTION_QNAME);
assCyanDescriptionProperty.addValue(
new PrismPropertyValue<String>("Assignment created out of the cyan"));
assignmentContainer.mergeValue(assCyanContainerValue);
assertEquals(
"Wrong number of assignment values (after cyan)",
2,
assignmentContainer.getValues().size());
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
// assignment values: construct assignment value from existing container
PrismContainerValue<AssignmentType> assRedContainerValue = assignmentContainer.createNewValue();
PrismProperty<String> assRedDescriptionProperty =
assRedContainerValue.findOrCreateProperty(USER_DESCRIPTION_QNAME);
assRedDescriptionProperty.addValue(
new PrismPropertyValue<String>("Assignment created out of the red"));
assertEquals(
"Wrong number of assignment values (after red)", 3, assignmentContainer.getValues().size());
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
// accountRef
PrismReference accountRef = user.findOrCreateReference(USER_ACCOUNTREF_QNAME);
assertEquals(USER_ACCOUNTREF_QNAME, accountRef.getElementName());
if (assertDefinitions)
PrismAsserts.assertDefinition(accountRef, OBJECT_REFERENCE_TYPE_QNAME, 0, -1);
accountRef.add(new PrismReferenceValue(ACCOUNT1_OID));
accountRef.add(new PrismReferenceValue(ACCOUNT2_OID));
PrismReference accountRefAgain = user.findOrCreateReference(USER_ACCOUNTREF_QNAME);
// The "==" is there by purpose. We really want to make sure that is the same *instance*, that
// is was not created again
assertTrue("Property not the same", accountRef == accountRefAgain);
assertEquals("accountRef size", 2, accountRef.getValues().size());
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
// extension
PrismContainer<?> extensionContainer = user.findOrCreateContainer(USER_EXTENSION_QNAME);
assertEquals(USER_EXTENSION_QNAME, extensionContainer.getElementName());
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
if (assertDefinitions) PrismAsserts.assertDefinition(extensionContainer, DOMUtil.XSD_ANY, 0, 1);
PrismContainer<AssignmentType> extensionContainerAgain =
user.findOrCreateContainer(USER_EXTENSION_QNAME);
// The "==" is there by purpose. We really want to make sure that is the same *instance*, that
// is was not created again
assertTrue("Extension not the same", extensionContainer == extensionContainerAgain);
assertEquals(
"Wrong number of extension values (empty)", 0, extensionContainer.getValues().size());
// extension / stringType
PrismProperty<String> stringTypeProperty =
extensionContainer.findOrCreateProperty(EXTENSION_STRING_TYPE_ELEMENT);
assertEquals(EXTENSION_STRING_TYPE_ELEMENT, stringTypeProperty.getElementName());
PrismAsserts.assertParentConsistency(user);
if (assertDefinitions)
PrismAsserts.assertDefinition(stringTypeProperty, DOMUtil.XSD_STRING, 0, -1);
// TODO
}