private static void dodgeExtendedStringLiterals(EcjTreePrinter printer) {
printer.skipProperty(StringLiteral.class, "lineNumber");
printer.skipPropertyIfHasValue(ExtendedStringLiteral.class, "lineNumber", -1);
printer.skipPropertyIfHasValue(ExtendedStringLiteral.class, "lineNumber", -2);
printer.skipPropertyIfHasValue(StringLiteral.class, "lineNumber", -1);
printer.skipPropertyIfHasValue(StringLiteral.class, "lineNumber", -2);
printer.stringReplace("ExtendedStringLiteral", "StringLiteral");
}
private static String convertToString0(ASTNode tree, EcjTreePrinter printer) {
dodgePostFixArraysInVarDeclarations(printer);
dodgeCombinedBinaryExpressions(printer);
dodgeExtendedStringLiterals(printer);
printer.visit(tree);
String string = printer.getContent();
return string;
}
private static void dodgeCombinedBinaryExpressions(EcjTreePrinter printer) {
printer.skipProperty(CombinedBinaryExpression.class, "arity");
printer.skipProperty(CombinedBinaryExpression.class, "arityMax");
printer.skipProperty(CombinedBinaryExpression.class, "referencesTable");
printer.stringReplace("CombinedBinaryExpression", "BinaryExpression");
}
/*
* boolean[] s, t; results in 1 TypeReference, pointed at by both LocalDeclarations.
* boolean s[], t[]; results in 2 identical TypeReference instances, but we can't figure that out and get it wrong.
* It doesn't actually matter though, and it's virtually impossible to get right (would involve having to reparse source).
*/
private static void dodgePostFixArraysInVarDeclarations(EcjTreePrinter printer) {
printer.skipReferenceTracking(LocalDeclaration.class, TypeReference.class);
printer.skipReferenceTracking(FieldDeclaration.class, TypeReference.class);
}
public static String convertToStringNoPositions(ASTNode tree) {
return convertToString0(tree, EcjTreePrinter.printerWithoutPositions());
}
