@Override
public void invalidateCache(CacheAccessBackDoor cacheAccess) {
cacheAccess.removeRelationshipFromCache(getKey());
/*
* If isRecovered() then beforeUpdate is the correct one UNLESS this is the second time this command
* is executed, where it might have been actually written out to disk so the fields are already -1. So
* we still need to check.
* If !isRecovered() then beforeUpdate is the same as record, so we are still ok.
* We don't check for !inUse() though because that is implicit in the call of this method.
* The above is a hand waiving proof that the conditions that lead to the patchDeletedRelationshipNodes()
* in the if below are the same as in RelationshipCommand.execute() so it should be safe.
*/
if (beforeUpdate.getFirstNode() != -1 || beforeUpdate.getSecondNode() != -1) {
cacheAccess.patchDeletedRelationshipNodes(
getKey(),
beforeUpdate.getFirstNode(),
beforeUpdate.getFirstNextRel(),
beforeUpdate.getSecondNode(),
beforeUpdate.getSecondNextRel());
}
if (record.getFirstNode() != -1 || record.getSecondNode() != -1) {
cacheAccess.removeNodeFromCache(record.getFirstNode());
cacheAccess.removeNodeFromCache(record.getSecondNode());
}
}
@Override
public void invalidateCache(CacheAccessBackDoor cacheAccess) {
long nodeId = this.getNodeId();
long relId = this.getRelId();
if (nodeId != -1) {
cacheAccess.removeNodeFromCache(nodeId);
} else if (relId != -1) {
cacheAccess.removeRelationshipFromCache(relId);
}
}
@Override
public void invalidateCache(CacheAccessBackDoor cacheAccess) {
cacheAccess.removeSchemaRuleFromCache(getKey());
}
