public void test(TestHarness th) {
LogRecord rec1 = new LogRecord(Level.CONFIG, "msg");
LogRecord rec2 = new LogRecord(Level.CONFIG, "msg2");
long s1, s2;
s1 = rec1.getSequenceNumber();
s2 = rec2.getSequenceNumber();
/* Check #1.
*
* It could happen that rec1 has a sequence number of
* Long.MAX_VALUE, or that rec1's sequence number is close to
* Long.MAX_VALUE and some background threads have created a few
* LogRecords between the creation of rec1 and rec2, so rec2's
* sequence number is equal to or slightly greater than
* Long.MIN_VALUE. In these cases, s2 would not be greater than
* s1, although the implementation of java.util.logging.LogRecord
* was entirely correct.
*
* While this event is extremely unlikely, it is not entirely
* impossible, so we can perform the subsequent check only if
* there was no arithmetic overflow.
*/
if ((s1 >= 0) == (s2 >= 0)) th.check(s2 > s1);
else th.check(true);
// Check #2.
rec2.setSequenceNumber(42);
th.check(rec2.getSequenceNumber() == 42);
// Check #3.
rec2.setSequenceNumber(s2);
th.check(rec2.getSequenceNumber() == s2);
}
