@Test
public void combinedIncorrectSelector() throws RecognitionException {
String crashingSelector = "p:not*() p:not() { }";
ANTLRParser compiler = new ANTLRParser();
ParseResult result = compiler.parseRuleset(crashingSelector);
assertNoTokenMissing(crashingSelector, result.getTree(), -1);
}
@Test
public void simpleIncorrectSelector() throws RecognitionException {
String crashingSelector = "p:not*()";
ANTLRParser compiler = new ANTLRParser();
ParseResult result = compiler.parseSelector(crashingSelector);
assertNoTokenMissing(crashingSelector, result.getTree(), 0);
}
@Test
public void stylesheet() throws RecognitionException {
String crashingSelector = "p:not([class**=\"lead\"]) {\n color: black;\n}";
ANTLRParser compiler = new ANTLRParser();
ParseResult result = compiler.parseStyleSheet(crashingSelector);
// the -3 is correct, even if it seems like huge hack. It sort of is.
// RBRACE }; LBRACE {; RBRACKET ] and LBRACKET [ are (correctly thrown away)
// and one dummy node EMPTY_COMBINATOR is added during the translation.
// therefore there are -3 dummy nodes
// this way of testing malformed trees is bad anyway,this needs to be changed
// for something more readable and stable. (These tests are broken with each tree change)
assertNoTokenMissing(crashingSelector, result.getTree(), -5);
}